Fapopedia

Content
If I wasn’t clear enough, Fapopedia is not another video tube, which is the most popular type of free porn site. In fact, their collection is limited to still images; there are no moving images or ASMR soundtracks to make you rip another pair of boxers while giving you the chills. In the conventional sense, it’s also not a nude celebrity website. Even though Miley Cyrus, Cardi B, and Demi Lovato are among the more well-known broads, the emphasis is primarily on women who were unknown until they started stripping off for the Internet.

This is a genuinely contemporary free porn site that adheres to the newest smut trend, which has gained significant traction over the past year, particularly since the pandemic began. This is a list of social media sluts and Instagram models, secret Snapchat babes, and the independent stars of Onlyfans and Patreon.

Snapchat porn is a fucking game changer in terms of trends in porno. Unlike VR, which perverts thought they wanted for decades, the new form of amateur smut is taking off much faster. The popularity of social media porn sites like OnlyFans, which emerged in the early 2000s and now seem to have existed forever, will rival that of cam sites and reality porn in a few years. The trend has undoubtedly been accelerated by social isolation, with traditional pornstars and even ex-Disney girls making money online using their webcams and iPhones.

Even though Fapopedia.net has only been around for a little over a month, they are riding this new wave of in-house peep shows to the moon. They currently receive well over 3,000 visitors every single fucking day and are on track to receive significantly more. They made a wise decision to enter the fray early, giving themselves a leg up on what will undoubtedly be a massive influx of imitators vying for their attention. All they need to do to maintain their competitive edge is to keep creating excellent content, keep the packaging attractive, and make sure everything is easily accessible.

If it weren’t for all the topless women, twat-spreading whores, and unashamed cocksuckers lining the page in perfect square thumbnails, the design would almost pass for a wholesome social media site or online encyclopedia. There is no spam visible thanks to my active adblocker, a pattern that persist throughout the visit. Since there isn’t much text on the screen, the layout is more akin to Instagram than Wikipedia.

The pretty girls speak for themselves, with their attractive smiles, good looks, and willingness to take selfies with cat ears or ball gags. They feature many  favorite Instagrammers, including Mackzjones, Amouranth, and Belle Delphine, as well as celebrities like Iggy Azalea and Ariana Grande and a good number of stunning young Instamodels

Even the much-discussed Bella Thorne Onlyfans leak was posted on Fapopedia.net.

Every day, Fapopedia is updated with new cosplay photos, explicit content, and social media nudes. The fact that they added three galleries on Saturday and three more on Sunday appears to be the result of a weekend slowdown.

Social Media Whores
We’ve established that Fapopedia.net has a great design and is packed with amazing content, including social media nudes and leaks, but how about convenience? So far, so good! It’s definitely an accessible collection from the get-go. The most recent site updates are easily accessible on the front page, followed by the most popular articles from the previous hour, day, week, and month. They advertise the newest and best up front like any good smut peddler.

Fapopedia is the name of the website, so it has some Wikipedia-like features. There are only so many things a Patreon/Onlyfans/Snapchat nude gallery site can have in common with an online encyclopedia about everything, if you think about it. Fapopedia, in my opinion, comes the closest to Wikipedia that it possibly can. In addition to an alphabet that you can click at the top to browse by letter, there is a search bar that will pull up over 6000 naked models from social media sites.

If there could be one change to the site, it would be to add content tags, which would make it more comparable to Wikipedia and other porn websites. Right now, the only way to search and browse is by name, making it challenging to find specific categories of content like blondes, cosplay, feet, or masturbation. A more streamlined wank session would result from the use of tags, which also provide a useful way to connect models that are comparable and related.

Their gallery format is fairly conventional; you are presented with a wall of thumbnail images, with full-size images accessible with a single click. Angie’s gallery takes up 13 pages even though there are only 50 thumbs on each gallery page.

Excellent website overall.

Despite the fact that Fapopedia.net lacks Wikipedia’s nerd cred, my extensive testing has shown that it’s a lot simpler to jack off to. Their selection of Snapchat nudes, Patreon porn, and social media nudes is expanding at an impressive rate, and their user-friendly layout makes it simple to leave without being interrupted by a ton of spam. Try looking up the Onlyfans girl you’ve been crushing on in the Fapopedia if you’ve already spent your allowance on a new body pillow waifu.